PROGRAMME FRAMEWORK FOR
INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT

IN SOLOMON ISLANDS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepared by:

 

 

 

 

NESTOR M. PESTELOS

Chief Technical Adviser

UNDP-UNOPS SOLOMON ISLANDS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION

AND PARTICIPATORY PLANNING PROGRAMME (SIDAPP)

 

 

 

 

 

October, 2001

Honiara, Solomon Islands
PROGRAMME FRAMEWORK

FOR INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT

IN SOLOMON ISLANDS

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

1.0     Vision for Rural Development:

Working Together to Build Communities in Solomon Islands

 

In Solomon Islands, Rural Development means Provincial Development.

 

It means developing the country as a whole in a situation where there are only very few relatively well developed urban enclaves, namely, Honiara, Auki and Gizo. In this sense, the Mission of rural development is to increase the capabilities of provinces in improving the quality of life in village communities where majority of the people live.

 

Given the natural physical fragmentation of the country and the relative weaknesses of government institutions, particularly in the provinces, the goal will then be to bring information and services to as many village people as possible so that they can participate in overall national development and ultimately share its benefits.

 

1.2     Implementation Strategy for a National Integrated Rural/Provincial  Development Programme (NIRPDP)

 

1.2.1    The overall implementation strategy is to strengthen the province as basic unit for the planning, implementation, management and monitoring of development plans and programmes

 

Each province will require technical assistance and funding support to produce the following outputs:

 

a.      a Provincial Development Profile indicating the current situation, including the impact of the recent social unrest on the delivery of basic services to communities; the existing resources available; the status of projects (community self-help; provincial, national and donor-executed projects, their present outreach to communities, and projects identified as priority by constituencies and community groups); assessment of provincial government administrative and financial operations;

 

b.      a Provincial Development Framework Plan and Budget incorporating specific targets for a given period per sector; priority areas for service coverage; investment opportunities for private sector development;  commitments from the national government and donors for priority programmes, etc.);

 

c.      a two-year Provincial Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Programme (PRRP) as part of the MDTS indicating the specific impact of the social unrest to the province and priority areas for assistance and investment to minimize or overcome such adverse effects of the crisis;

 

d.      a Provincial Economic Growth Strategy identifying a specific comparative advantage vis-à-vis other provinces or based on an assessment of existing resources which could be further developed for making available specific products and services to domestic or overseas markets; and

 

e.      a Provincial Support Programme to Develop the Subsistence Economy and its linkage to the formal economy as part of the overall economic growth stimulus package during the period of rehabilitation and reconstruction;

 

f.       a Provincial Support Programme for Urban Development as part of the Provincial Development Plan indicating specific linkage to rural-based initiatives, market opportunities, expansion of current services and improvement in both outreach and quality;  and

 

g.      a Community-based  Provincial Project Monitoring System to determine periodically the status of programmes and projects using existing staff at provincial and substation level, combined with development volunteers at constituency and village level.

 

1.3     The National Development Plan,  in conjunction with the NIRPDP, will indicate required  policy and programme support to assist provinces cope with long-embedded and traditional constraints to developments.

 

These policy and programme support has to include the following:

 

1.3.1      A comprehensive policy and strategy framework for the provinces indicating a realistic and multi-faceted development model to enable the provinces to see how their own respective development relate to the overall national situation; how each province can contribute to the country’s economic growth; and the specific benefits to be derived by resource owners and local communities in the sustainable exploitation of provincial resources.

 

Previous national development plans, including the Medium Term Development Strategy (MDTS), lack regional or spatial dimension. They only reflect the macro and sectoral aspects. As a result, provincial authorities and local communities do not view the particular development of their province in terms of the larger picture, in terms of an overall national plan. 

 

1.3.2      A review of the Government’s financial management system to achieve cost-effectiveness and ensure balanced and equitable development

 

Questions recently raised by Provinces with regard to the Government’s financial management include the following:

 

§         How can we ensure that Provinces get a better share of the revenue from the exploitation of their natural resources;

 

§         What is the share of national revenue spent on the Provinces;

 

§         Why does Government do not fully deliver its Provincial grant allocations;

§         How can we better incorporate the aspirations and priorities of constituencies and villages into the national and provincial budget systems;

 

§         What is the capacity of Provincial Governments to operate a decentralized financial management system.

 

1.3.3  A comprehensive study of land issues and initiate vigorous and purposeful efforts to involve all stakeholders in resolving them

 

·         Review the Constitution and make it Solomon Islander friendly

 

The land-related issues which have been suggested to be included are as follows –

 

Freedom of movement and freedom of settlement;

 

Issues arising from inter-island marriages or marriages between matrilineal and matrilineal societies which pertain to conflicting rules on owning land or inheriting land;

 

Multi-ethnic composition of the country and their implications to variations in traditions and cultures defining land use and ownership.

 

·         Review the Land and Titles Act

 

Current moves towards decentralization through a State/Federal Government system will have to be complemented by measures such as the decentralization of the functions of the Office of the Commissioner of Lands; the Office of the Surveyor General; the Registrar of Titles; and the Office of the Valuer General.

 


 

·         Prepare a Strategic Plan for the Return of Alienated Land

 

It is proposed in the paper that alienated land should be developed first prior to their return to original landowners or provincial governments. Establishing the original landowners will require tedious investigation, but this has to be done to avoid potential problems.

 

Given the differences in cultures, languages and customs relating to land rights in the country, it may not be appropriate to have a single legislation to cover customary land. It is recommended that provinces be given the right to codify their own customary laws within a general legislation on land.

 

·         Conduct nation-wide consultations on land issues

 

In the aftermath of a devastating social conflict, a root cause of which could be traced to land-related issues, it has been recommended that nation-wide consultations be undertaken by the appropriate government agency to clarify these issues and seek all possible suggestions and ideas on how resolve them.

 

Without such resolution, any programme on rural and provincial development will not be sustainable in the long run.

 

1.3.4      Establish Sound Rural Financial Intermediaries and Market

 

Here are recommendations on how to improve the rural financial markets:

 

·         The concerned rural financial institution must charge the appropriate interest rate that will cover the full financial, operational and loan risk costs.

 

With an adequate interest spread, the financial institution can be profitable and sustainable and will continue to provide financial services to its rural clientele and reduce its dependence on government support and subsidy.

 

·         Mobilisation of rural savings to ensure self-reliance and paying an appropriate real interest rates on these deposits.

 

This can be possible if the lending rates are set high as indicated above.  Rural savings facility is lacking the rural communities and, therefore, farmers and entrepreneurs are not able to save part of their income for future use.  Loan clients may have more discipline if they know they are borrowing their neighbours’ savings.


 

·         The financial institution must be committed to the rural communities.

 

Branch and sub-branch offices must be given some form of autonomy and should be close to their clientele.  They should be operated as profit centers.

 

·         Shifting the focus from loan approval and disbursement to loan recovery and savings mobilization.

 

Credit cannot be created on its own; its source is savings. Rural communities must be encouraged to save.

 

·         Staff retraining must be undertaken.

 

This is important to enable the financial institution to perform its demanding task.

 

·         Providing incentives to good paying clients.

 

Interest rebate and promise of future loans are examples of incentives.  It is also good to link staff incentives to the performance of the loan portfolio.

 

·         Setting in place appropriate legal and suitable external supervision framework.

 

This will deal with ceilings on lending rates, reserve requirements on deposits, and the imposition of mandatory lending and prudential banking standards.

 

The financial institution should be located in an identified rural growth centre or an Integrated Area Development Project (IADP) site in a province.

 

1.3.5      Formulate a Long-term Plan for Rural Infrastructure Development

 

Rural infrastructure can stimulate economic growth and extend the outreach of services to the rural communities. It can make possible amenities and facilities that can attract back to the province those who have left for Honiara.

 

The reference paper recommends the following:

 

·         For the National Government to formulate a 20-Year Infrastructure Development Plan for each of the Provinces 

 

Previous experience has proven that 5-year plans do not work when it comes to infrastructure.  A longer time frame is more realistic considering a number of problems that have to be overcome, e.g. funding, resolving land issues, community consultations to finalise locations, etc.

 

The National Government should be able to articulate a set of policies that will govern the planning, implementation and management of rural infrastructure. This will facilitate a well-coordinated approach to building infrastructure in the provinces based on an overall national development strategy. 

 

The National Government should be able to define clearly the roles of provincial governments, churches and NGOs, private sector, local communities and family heads in the planning, building and maintenance of rural infrastructure.

 

·         For the landowners in each province to be oriented on the importance of building the infrastructure on their own land.

 

This orientation should be part of a well-coordinated land policy.

 

·         For the Government to deal with misuse of public funds allocated for rural infrastructure.

 

This is both an administrative and political problem that both national and provincial governments should be able to deal with.

 

1.3.6      Assist Provinces to Assume Greater Responsibilities and to Discharge their Tasks under a more Decentralised Form of Governance

 

For too long a time, the Provinces have pursued decentralisation, or devolution of more political, administrative and other decision-making powers from the centre to the periphery, as an objective.

 

The National Integrated Rural/Provincial Development Programme can serve as a vehicle to assist Provinces initiate a systematic capability-building process and prepare for assuming greater responsibilities even before a more decentralised form of governance is put in place.

 

The following strategic activities can be pursued towards this end:

 

v      Clarification of the respective roles of the public service employees and the political leaders in the exercise of governance and administration of services within the province;

 

v      Assessment of the various indigenous institutions and community-based structures utilised by sectoral agencies in the delivery of basic services, taking into account their possible formal linkage to appropriate government bodies, such as the provincial substations, for the purpose of project implementation and monitoring;

 

v      Support to a rural development volunteers scheme  to ensure the involvement of out-of-school youth in village development;

 

v      Preparation of a Provincial Substation Improvement Project to be designed as key strategy in extending the outreach of government programmes to relatively remote rural villages;

 

v      Refocusing the mission of Provincial Development Authorities towards providing support to the possible expansion of the subsistence economy;

 

v      Improvement of the existing communication system amongst villages, between the provincial centre and the constituencies, and other entities through the use of simple technologies, such as high frequency radio, solar power, etc.;

 

v      Identification of project site/mobilization of resources towards the eventual implementation of an Integrated Area Development Project (IADP) within the Province;

 

v      Strengthening the mechanism for Constituency profiling, action planning and project development with focus on the participation of disadvantaged villages and groups.

 

 

 

 

30 October 2001

Honiara, Solomon Islands